India seeks to boost its manufacturing industry and cut the trade deficit
Feb 27th 2016 | MUMBAI | From the print edition
SHIPS leaving Nhava Sheva port, across the
harbour from Mumbai, tend to ride higher on the
water than when they arrive. India’s trading
statistics explain why: steel and other industrial
goods from China weigh down the ships as they
come in, to be replaced on the way out by fluffy
cotton bales, pills and—given India’s perennial
trade deficit in goods—empty containers.
India’s economy grew by 7.5% last year, cruising past China’s 6.9% growth. Yet the deficit in
goods trade with China continues to widen (see chart), to over 2% of GDP last year. For Indian
policymakers this is an irksome reminder of the weakness of the country’s manufacturers.
Halving the trade shortfall with China would be enough to eliminate India’s overall currentaccount
deficit, and thus the need for external financing.
The government’s ideas for shrinking the shortfall have been sadly predictable. The minimum
import prices it imposed earlier this month on various grades of Chinese steel, which it claims
are being “dumped” below cost, come on top of other antidumping levies and taxes on steel
and myriad other products, from raw silk to melamine dinner sets. No country has used such
measures as energetically as India over the past 20 years, according to the World Trade
The commerce minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, has called for a devaluation of the rupee to curb
imports and boost exports. Yet the rupee has been falling against the yuan for years, with little
effect on trade. And a weakening currency could revive inflation, which falling oil prices and
sound monetary policy have helped tame.
The government looks longingly at manufacturing’s 32% share of China’s GDP, roughly double
the Indian figure. It sees factories as the ideal way to soak up the millionodd young workers who join the labour force every month. So it is showering sops on various industries. It is handing out
subsidised loans to smallscale and labourintensive industries such as ceramics and bicycle
parts. Lightlytaxed “special economic zones”, many of which are set up to benefit a single
company, are in line for further handouts.
A “Make in India” jamboree in Mumbai earlier this month sought to present an image of
openness to foreign investment, eliciting promises of multibilliondollar plants from firms keen
to cosy up to policymakers. But India is trying to emulate China’s exportled manufacturing
growth in a global economy that is now drowning in China’s industrial surpluses. It hopes to fill
the vacuum left by its larger neighbour as Chinese wages rise, to double those of Indians, and its
economy rebalances from exports to consumption. Yet so far it has struggled to seize that
Why countries are so keen to agree new trade deals
Indian firms grumble, with some justification, about their products being shut out of the
Chinese market. Agricultural products, of which India is a net exporter, are largely excluded
from China through various phytosanitary rules. Indian pharmaceutical firms complain that
China’s growing aid to other developing countries often includes the provision of medicines—
Chinesemade ones, of course—which means that the recipient countries buy fewer Indianmade
drugs than they used to.
India runs a global surplus in services, mainly by selling them to rich countries. But they are a
small component of IndoChinese trade. China gets the best of tourist exchanges between the
two countries: 181,000 Chinese tourists came to India in 2014, against 730,000 Indians who
visited China. All this tortures Indians, for whom China is the biggest source of imports and
thirdbiggest export market, but barely troubles China, for whom India is a secondtier trade
partner. Indian policymakers are reflexively sceptical, for example, of China’s plan to build a
road linking the countries, worrying it will only widen the trade imbalance.
If China’s consumers won’t buy Indian goods, perhaps its businesses could build factories in
India instead? Some big projects have recently been announced, notably a $10 billion industrial
park to be developed by Dalian Wanda, a Chinese property group; and a $5 billion plant
proposed by Foxconn, a Taiwanese electronics outfit which mainly manufactures in China.
Foxconn said last July that it might employ up to 1m Indians in 1012 plants by 2020, despite
suffering labour strife when it closed an existing factory last year. However, foreign investors’
projects often fall quietly by the wayside when bureaucratic obstacles prove insurmountable.
Foxconn is already said to be rolling back its ambitions.
After years in the doldrums, India is enjoying its moment as the world’s fastestgrowing large
economy. That in itself will be enough to pique the interest of multinationals: Apple, for
example, thinks a sales push in India can help make up for sluggish Chinese demand. Even so,
it will be a while before its devices (whose assembly it outsources to Foxconn) are made in India.
Instead, they will further weigh down the ships entering its ports.
From : http://www.economist.com/Business